Karolina Berankova vs Kathleen Kanev Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L W W L
Form
L W W L W L W L L LHead-To-Head: Berankova 1 - 0 Kanev
They have played 2 sets in total, with Berankova winning 2 and Kanev winning 0. The last match between Berankova and Kanev was at the W15 Jablonec Nad Nisou, 03-12-2019, First, Carpet with Karolina Berankova getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Karolina Berankova | 1 |
| Kathleen Kanev | 0 |
W15 Jablonec Nad Nisou(03-12-2019)
6
2
6
4
| Berankova | Stats | Kanev |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 45% (5-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 787 |
| 600 | Highest Rank | 368 |
| 24 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 56% (62-48) | Career Total W/L | 54% (155-134) |
| $1,005 | Career Prize Money | $1,804 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Michelsen VS Bublik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Karolina Berankova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Eva Lys
Player
Karolina Berankova
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karolina Berankova
Player
Mina Hodzic
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Karolina Berankova
Player
Lena Ruppert
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
24%
(
6 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dea Herdzelas
Player
Karolina Berankova
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
5
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Karolina Berankova
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miriam Kolodziejova
Player
Karolina Berankova
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karolina Berankova
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
95)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Pepelyaeva
Player
Karolina Berankova
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Kathleen Kanev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Angelica Blake
Player
Kathleen Kanev
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve %
85%
(
40 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Weckerle
Player
Kathleen Kanev
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Kathleen Kanev
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
83%
(
50 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kathleen Kanev
Player
Noemi Basiletti
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Zelinskaya
Player
Kathleen Kanev
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
76%
(
69 of
91)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
46 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kathleen Kanev
Player
Kateryna Lazarenko
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Webley-Smith
Player
Kathleen Kanev
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
27%
(
9 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Kathleen Kanev
Player
Giulia Alessia Monteleone
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kathleen Kanev
Player
Maria Fernanda Morales
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (62/48) | Win/Loss | 54% (155/134) |
| 56% (134/105) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (352/308) |
| 53% (1123/992) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3144/2869) |
| 67% (37/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (79/56) |
| 27% (7/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (35/45) |
| 62% (18/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (41/33) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 263 | Aces Total | 163 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 276 | Total Double Faults | 684 |
| 1:16:48 | Average Match Time | 1:22:1 |
| 557.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 441.98 |
| 58% (3469/6010) | 1st Serve % | 69% (11365/16424) |
| 64% (2222/3469) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (6773/11365) |
| 45% (1148/2541) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2217/5063) |
| 50% (349/705) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1043/2127) |
| 45% (2679/5933) | Return Points Win % | 46% (7699/16568) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (9/9) | Challenger W/L | 50% (81/82) |
| 59% (52/36) | Futures W/L | 59% (73/51) |
| 57% (62/109) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (155/288) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (8/19) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (21/51) |
| 50% (10/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (41/83) |
| 90% (60/54) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (153/134) |
| 10% (60/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (153/19) |
| 16% (50/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (136/21) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
